I agree with brownPinkWater completely. I understand you guys have good intentions, but this is a little bit too much in my opinion.
Also, I have a brother, we live together and use the same devices. we’re both human and we have never cheated in our lives. there can be 4-5-6 people living together, all in crypto and using the same devices basically. plus, what information is being taken from the devices other than the ip addresses? there’s just way too many negatives to this proposal than positives and I will respectfully object to this one
Thank you for your thoughtful comment. I understand your concerns and I want to assure you that the privacy and security of users are our top priorities.
In the case of multiple users sharing a device, we’re considering the use of ERC1155 format tokens. This would allow multiple accounts to be associated with a single device, while still maintaining the uniqueness of each account.
As for the data being collected, the application will not collect raw data from your device. Instead, it will generate a hash based on certain device parameters. This hash, which cannot be reversed-engineered to obtain the original data, will be sent to the Galxe site for the minting of the NFT.
The process is designed to be quick and efficient, with the identification of a device taking place in a matter of minutes and with a minimum commission.
This proposal is primarily aimed at discouraging sybil attacks, where one person creates multiple accounts to gain an unfair advantage. If you’re not involved in such activities, you have nothing to fear.
I appreciate your feedback and I’m open to further discussions to refine this proposal. Your input is valuable in ensuring we create a system that is fair, secure, and respects user privacy.
Absolutely, that’s a great point! Just like when buying a used car, you’d want to ensure the title is transferred to you, the same applies in the web3 space with NFTs tied to devices. If you’re purchasing a used device, it’s important to ask the previous owner about any associated NFTs. If there is an NFT tied to the device, the owner should transfer it to you as part of the sale. This way, you’ll have full ownership of the device in both the physical and digital realms.
I believe his to be a very helpful idea which will be beneficial for he community and of course to the platform. This would help save time, energy and resources not to mention improved efficiency which would mean competency. Kudos! It’s definitely a YES for me. Good luck and I hope you’re gonna have a good day ahead guys
Thank you so much for your kind words and support! It’s encouraging to see that the community recognizes the potential benefits of this idea. I believe that together, we can make a significant positive impact on the efficiency and security of our platform. Your ‘YES’ means a lot to me. Let’s continue to innovate and improve the crypto space. Have a fantastic day ahead!
Thank you for your kind words and support! You’re absolutely right, it’s a significant undertaking, but I believe it’s a necessary step to enhance security and uniqueness in the crypto space. Your encouragement means a lot and fuels my determination to make this idea a reality. Stay tuned for more updates!
Good!! Suggestions and complementarity are really important. Thank you again!! The proposal is in contact with the good side!! I hope it will help contribute to and supplement the community.I will also support and support you. Thank you.
Thank you so much for your kind words and support! I’m thrilled to hear that you find the proposal valuable. It’s contributions and feedback from community members like you that help ideas grow and evolve. I’m looking forward to working together to make this idea a reality and contribute to the growth of our community. Thanks again for your encouragement!
You’re welcome! I’m glad you’re interested. Here’s a bit more about the idea:
The proposed application is designed to uniquely identify each device that interacts with the Galxe platform. It does this by collecting specific device parameters and using them to generate a unique hash. This hash is then used to mint a unique NFT (Non-Fungible Token) that is stored in the user’s EVM-compatible wallet.
The primary goal of this idea is to discourage multi-accounting, a practice where a single user maintains multiple accounts. By binding each device to a unique NFT, we can ensure that each account corresponds to a unique device, making it more difficult for a user to manage multiple accounts.
Furthermore, the minted NFTs can serve as unique digital assets that can be traded or sold, adding an extra layer of functionality and value to the user experience.
The very idea of how to counteract the sybils is already good.
Users who receive an airdrop and see that projects have been given the green color to use it expand exponentially. This demotivates regular users and reduces the chance of success.
I think your proposal is not bad, but it carries a more technical context, as an ordinary user it is difficult for me to accept such information, I had to re-read the sentence a couple of times.
Thank you so much for your kind words and support! It truly means a lot. I’m also excited about the potential of this proposal and looking forward to seeing it come to life. Stay tuned for more updates!
